<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/wp-content/themes/feed/atom.xsl"?>
<feed
        xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
        xmlns:wwe="http://release.wwe.com/atom/1.0"
        xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
        xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
        xml:lang="en-US"
        xml:base="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/wp-atom.php"
	>
    <title type="text">Bertelson Law Office, P.A.</title>
    <subtitle type="text">Bertelson Law Office, P.A.</subtitle>

    <updated>2025-06-17T09:17:21Z</updated>

    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com" />
    <id>https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/feed/atom/</id>
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/feed/atom/?forceByPassCache=0.8415277021046031" />
	
	<generator uri="https://wordpress.org/" version="6.9.4">WordPress</generator>
<icon>/wp-content/uploads/sites/1302033/2019/10/cropped-site_identity-32x32.jpg</icon>
        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by Bertelson Law Office, P.A.</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Non-Compete Agreements]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/blog/2025/05/non-compete-agreements/" />
            <id>https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/?p=52652</id>
            <updated>2025-05-23T14:36:39Z</updated>
            <published>2025-05-23T14:36:39Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Since July 1, 2023, Minnesota has banned new non-compete agreements.  The are only two exceptions.  Non-competes are legal for a sale of a business or a dissolution of a business. Employers cannot get around Minnesota’s non-compete ban by placing non-competes in severance agreements or other employment agreements if you never signed a non-compete agreement before July 1, 2023. While employers…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/blog/2025/05/non-compete-agreements/"><![CDATA[Since July 1, 2023, Minnesota has banned new non-compete agreements.  The are only two exceptions.  Non-competes are legal for a sale of a business or a dissolution of a business.

Employers cannot get around Minnesota’s non-compete ban by placing non-competes in severance agreements or other employment agreements if you never signed a non-compete agreement before July 1, 2023.

While employers can have non-solicitation agreements, they should be narrowly tailored and simply serve as a workaround non-compete.

Continue to be alert to employment agreements your employer asks you sign, as well as post-employment agreements.

&nbsp;]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Bertelson Law Office, P.A.</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/blog/2023/07/the-pregnant-workers-fairness-act/" />
            <id>https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/?p=52621</id>
            <updated>2023-09-13T08:53:33Z</updated>
            <published>2023-07-12T20:54:05Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[Pregnancy Accommodations, Pregnancy Discrimination]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) became effective on June 27, 2023.  It expands protections for pregnant workers who work for employers with 15 or more employees. Employer must make reasonable accommodations to known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions by engaging in an interactive process with the employee. Employer cannot require an employee covered by the…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/blog/2023/07/the-pregnant-workers-fairness-act/"><![CDATA[The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) became effective on June 27, 2023.  It expands protections for pregnant workers who work for employers with 15 or more employees.

Employer must make reasonable accommodations to known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions by engaging in an interactive process with the employee.

Employer cannot require an employee covered by the PWFA to take paid or unpaid leave if another reasonable accommodation is available.

The PWFA also protects employees covered by the PWFA from retaliation, coercion, intimidation, threats, or interference if they request or receive a reasonable accommodation.

&nbsp;]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Bertelson Law Office, P.A.</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[MN Bans New Non-Compete Agreements Starting July 1, 2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/blog/2023/05/mn-bans-new-non-compete-agreements-starting-july-1-2023/" />
            <id>https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/?p=52594</id>
            <updated>2023-09-13T08:53:38Z</updated>
            <published>2023-05-30T14:42:17Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Starting July 1, 2023, non-compete agreements are prohibited in Minnesota. This is a major victory for employee rights. The law prohibits all non-compete agreements with an employee or independent contractor working for the employer, regardless of the employee’s income or job title. There are only two limited exceptions.  Non-competes will be valid and enforceable if they strict similar business for…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/blog/2023/05/mn-bans-new-non-compete-agreements-starting-july-1-2023/"><![CDATA[Starting July 1, 2023, non-compete agreements are prohibited in Minnesota. This is a major victory for employee rights.

The law prohibits all non-compete agreements with an employee or independent contractor working for the employer, regardless of the employee’s income or job title.

There are only two limited exceptions.  Non-competes will be valid and enforceable if they strict similar business for a reasonable period of time and in a reasonable geographic area if they are agreed to: (1) during the sale of a business; or (2) in anticipation of the dissolution of a business.

Courts may award attorneys’ fees to individuals required to enforce their rights under this law.

Non-competes entered into <em>before</em> July 1, 2023 remain enforceable in Minnesota.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Bertelson Law Office, P.A.</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Thinking of Retiring?]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/blog/2023/03/thinking-of-retiring/" />
            <id>https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/?p=52590</id>
            <updated>2023-09-13T08:53:43Z</updated>
            <published>2023-03-14T18:53:40Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[If you are thinking about retiring or feeling forced to retire, we can help you develop a strategy. Before you mention retirement to your employer, contact Bertelson Law Offices, P.A. for proactive advice.    ]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/blog/2023/03/thinking-of-retiring/"><![CDATA[If you are thinking about retiring or feeling forced to retire, we can help you develop a strategy.

Before you mention retirement to your employer, contact Bertelson Law Offices, P.A. for proactive advice.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Bertelson Law Office, P.A.</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Companies and Candidates Confront Job Scams]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/blog/2023/01/companies-and-candidates-confront-job-scams/" />
            <id>https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/?p=52296</id>
            <updated>2023-09-13T08:53:49Z</updated>
            <published>2023-01-18T21:45:40Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[From The Wall Street Journal, Workplace Report, dated January 18, 2022.  Authored by Stephanie Forshee, a New York-based freelance writer. Video-editing company Kapwing Inc. co-founder Julia Enthoven began to receive emails last summer from people who were thrilled to have landed dream jobs at her company. The catch: Those jobs didn’t exist. The candidates were victims of job recruitment fraud…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/blog/2023/01/companies-and-candidates-confront-job-scams/"><![CDATA[From <em>The Wall Street Journal, Workplace Report</em>, dated January 18, 2022.  Authored by Stephanie Forshee, a New York-based freelance writer.

Video-editing company Kapwing Inc. co-founder Julia Enthoven began to receive emails last summer from people who were thrilled to have landed dream jobs at her company. The catch: Those jobs didn’t exist.

The candidates were victims of job recruitment fraud perpetrated by cybercriminals who posted fake job ads, interviewed candidates while posing as recruiters and made job offers—all to gain personal financial information.

“It makes me really sad that video editors are the targets because those are people who we want to support and we want to give back to,” Ms. Enthoven said.

In the era of many workplace tasks being done remotely, including recruitment, job scams that target laid-off workers are on the rise, said Kati Daffan, assistant director of the division of marketing practices at the Federal Trade Commission. Companies and human-resources departments are especially vulnerable to such impersonation. In recent months, job seekers faced offers from scammers posing as recruiters from a range of employers, including <a href="https://theworkplacereport.cmail20.com/t/d-l-ziyoht-iytrudldud-u/" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Wells Fargo &amp; Co.</a>, <a href="https://theworkplacereport.cmail20.com/t/d-l-ziyoht-iytrudldud-o/" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Costco Wholesale Corp.</a> and <a href="https://theworkplacereport.cmail20.com/t/d-l-ziyoht-iytrudldud-b/" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Levi Strauss &amp; Co.</a>

“This is a pervasive problem,” Ms. Daffan said. “Unfortunately, if it hasn’t happened to a particular company, it could at some point.”

The FTC <a href="https://theworkplacereport.cmail20.com/t/d-l-ziyoht-iytrudldud-n/" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">received</a> more than 53,000 job scam reports in the first three quarters of 2022. Roughly $249 million was lost during that same time period, according to the FTC data. And at least one victim handed over their date of birth, address and bank name, according to a complaint filed with the FTC.

In the scam at San Francisco-based Kapwing, the fraudster <a href="https://theworkplacereport.cmail20.com/t/d-l-ziyoht-iytrudldud-p/" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">purported</a> to be Ms. Enthoven and reached out to applicants offering them $90-per-hour video editor positions that didn’t exist. “There were definitely people who were excited about the opportunity,” Ms. Enthoven said, adding that such scams put job candidates “in a vulnerable place.” Many of the candidates the scammer contacted said they began to grow suspicious and reached out to Kapwing executives.

Ms. Enthoven described the experience in a blog post and shared it on social media, including LinkedIn and Twitter. The mass outreach was intended to warn job candidates and deter scammers.

In another job scam, fraudsters targeted SmartBug Media Inc., an Irvine, Calif.-based marketing agency. Jen Spencer, its chief executive, warned job applicants in a <a href="https://theworkplacereport.cmail20.com/t/d-l-ziyoht-iytrudldud-x/" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">LinkedIn post</a>.

In some cases, impersonators used the real names of SmartBug employees. They set up interviews that lasted up to two hours. The scammers would then extend “fake” job offers, tell the individuals they needed to buy equipment, such as a work laptop, and send a copy of a blank check for payroll purposes. The goal was to steal personal financial information. Ms. Spencer heard from victims who had quit their jobs only to learn that the opportunity at SmartBug wasn’t real.

Victims of fake-check scams on average lost $2,300, based on 2020 data, Ms. Daffan said.

Ms. Spencer said her team directed people to SmartBug’s careers page to match victims with real current openings. The company also considered installing monitoring software that would cost $35,000 annually and that would alert the company if domains with similar web addresses are created. But the cost was too much for the small business, and she decided against the service.

And as The Wall Street Journal <a href="https://theworkplacereport.cmail20.com/t/d-l-ziyoht-iytrudldud-m/" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">reported</a> last week, laid-off tech workers have increasingly been baited by job scammers seeking financial and personal information. But the scams reach far beyond the tech industry. Aerospace company <a href="https://theworkplacereport.cmail20.com/t/d-l-ziyoht-iytrudldud-c/" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Boeing Co.</a> and drugstore chain <a href="https://theworkplacereport.cmail20.com/t/d-l-ziyoht-iytrudldud-q/" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Walgreens Co.</a>, for instance, have blanket statements about warning signs for employment and recruitment scams.

Wells Fargo, Costco and Boeing declined to comment. Levi Strauss didn’t respond to a request for comment, while Walgreens said: “We have not seen any impact on our hiring and the disclaimer is there for awareness for potential job seekers.”

Many of these companies have used social media to spread awareness about the issue. Levi Strauss’s HR professionals <a href="https://theworkplacereport.cmail20.com/t/d-l-ziyoht-iytrudldud-a/" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">warned</a> on LinkedIn that they were <a href="https://theworkplacereport.cmail20.com/t/d-l-ziyoht-iytrudldud-f/" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">dealing</a> with incidents of employment scams last summer, and encouraged applicants to report these scams to the FTC or Federal Bureau of Investigation.

According to the Better Business Bureau, many fake jobs are posted on job sites such as Indeed.com, which has received 32% of known scams, and LinkedIn, with 7%.

“Indeed removes tens of millions of job listings each month that do not meet our quality guidelines,” the company said. “In addition, Indeed will not do business with an employer if their job listings don’t pass our stringent quality guidelines.”

LinkedIn said it uses both automated and manual defenses to protect members. Both sites say they vet job posters and listings and encourage candidates to report suspicious posts to authorities.

Many job seekers encounter challenges when looking for and applying to jobs, with 36% citing job scams as a major frustration.

A <a href="https://theworkplacereport.cmail20.com/t/d-l-ziyoht-iytrudldud-e/" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">recent survey</a> by job search advice site Job-Hunt and online job site FlexJobs shed some light on the top frustrations job seekers encounter. The study surveyed more than 2,200 people between February and March 2022.

Other major sources of dissatisfaction for job seekers:
<ul>
 	<li>Half of respondents (50%) said not hearing back from employers is the No. 1 job search frustration</li>
 	<li>42% said they are frustrated by jobs offering low salaries</li>
 	<li>Nearly 40% said they find it frustrating when a job posting required qualifications or degrees that might not affect the ability to do the job</li>
 	<li>38% said applying for a job can be a lengthy process</li>
 	<li>Not finding jobs that they qualify for (32%)</li>
 	<li>Formatting application materials for applicant tracking systems (25%)</li>
 	<li>Not finding jobs at companies they want to work for (25%)</li>
 	<li>Not finding jobs in industries they’re interested in (21%)</li>
 	<li>Not being able to identify the hiring manager (15%)</li>
</ul>
<a href="https://theworkplacereport.cmail20.com/t/d-l-ziyoht-iytrudldud-s/" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Access the full report</a>.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Bertelson Law Office, P.A.</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[FTC Proposes Rule to Ban Noncompete Clauses, Which Hurt Workers and Harm Competition]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/blog/2023/01/ftc-proposes-rule-to-ban-noncompete-clauses-which-hurt-workers-and-harm-competition/" />
            <id>https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/?p=52295</id>
            <updated>2023-09-13T08:53:54Z</updated>
            <published>2023-01-12T15:08:52Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[Noncompete]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[On January 5, 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) proposed a new rule that would ban employers from imposing and enforcing non-compete agreements. Excerpts from the FTC’s website on the proposed rule: The Federal Trade Commission proposed a new rule that would ban employers from imposing noncompetes on their workers, a widespread and often exploitative practice that suppresses wages, hampers innovation, and…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/blog/2023/01/ftc-proposes-rule-to-ban-noncompete-clauses-which-hurt-workers-and-harm-competition/"><![CDATA[On January 5, 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) proposed a new rule that would ban employers from imposing and enforcing non-compete agreements.

Excerpts from the FTC's website on the proposed rule:

The Federal Trade Commission <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/federal-register-notices/non-compete-clause-rulemaking" data-entity-substitution="canonical" data-entity-type="node" data-entity-uuid="8bf80a63-66b5-4396-bbe3-c7f82d4ce245" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">proposed a new rule</a> that would ban employers from imposing noncompetes on their workers, a widespread and often exploitative practice that suppresses wages, hampers innovation, and blocks entrepreneurs from starting new businesses. By stopping this practice, the agency estimates that the new proposed rule could increase wages by nearly $300 billion per year and expand career opportunities for about 30 million Americans.

The FTC is <a href="https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FTC-2023-0007/document" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">seeking public comment</a> on the proposed rule, which is based on a preliminary finding that noncompetes constitute an unfair method of competition and therefore violate Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

“The freedom to change jobs is core to economic liberty and to a competitive, thriving economy,” said Chair Lina M. Khan. “Noncompetes block workers from freely switching jobs, depriving them of higher wages and better working conditions, and depriving businesses of a talent pool that they need to build and expand. By ending this practice, the FTC’s proposed rule would promote greater dynamism, innovation, and healthy competition.”

Companies use noncompetes for workers across industries and job levels, from hairstylists and warehouse workers to doctors and business executives. In many cases, employers use their outsized bargaining power to coerce workers into signing these contracts. Noncompetes harm competition in U.S. labor markets by blocking workers from pursuing better opportunities and by preventing employers from hiring the best available talent.

“Research shows that employers’ use of noncompetes to restrict workers’ mobility significantly suppresses workers’ wages—even for those not subject to noncompetes, or subject to noncompetes that are unenforceable under state law," said Elizabeth Wilkins, Director of the Office of Policy Planning. “The proposed rule would ensure that employers can’t exploit their outsized bargaining power to limit workers’ opportunities and stifle competition.”

The evidence shows that noncompete clauses also hinder innovation and business dynamism in multiple ways—from preventing would-be entrepreneurs from forming competing businesses, to inhibiting workers from bringing innovative ideas to new companies. This ultimately harms consumers; in markets with fewer new entrants and greater concentration, consumers can face higher prices—as seen in the health care sector.

To address these problems, the FTC’s proposed rule would generally prohibit employers from using noncompete clauses. Specifically, the FTC’s new rule would make it illegal for an employer to:
<ul>
 	<li>enter into or attempt to enter into a noncompete with a worker;</li>
 	<li>maintain a noncompete with a worker; or</li>
 	<li>represent to a worker, under certain circumstances, that the worker is subject to a noncompete.</li>
</ul>
The proposed rule would apply to independent contractors and anyone who works for an employer, whether paid or unpaid. It would also require employers to rescind existing noncompetes and actively inform workers that they are no longer in effect.

The proposed rule would generally not apply to other types of employment restrictions, like non-disclosure agreements. However, other types of employment restrictions could be subject to the rule if they are so broad in scope that they function as noncompetes.

&nbsp;]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Bertelson Law Office, P.A.</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Key Considerations for an Executive Reviewing or Negotiating an Executive Employment Contract]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/blog/2022/04/key-considerations-for-an-executive-reviewing-or-negotiating-an-executive-employment-contract/" />
            <id>https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/?p=52230</id>
            <updated>2023-09-13T08:53:57Z</updated>
            <published>2022-04-13T20:55:36Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[Employment Contract, Executive Contract]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[A well-defined employment contract allows both the Executive and the Company to enter a relationship with a clear and positive view toward the future relationship. Bertelson Law Office can help negotiate language to protect your interests. Five key considerations for Executive Contracting: Remember You Bring Unique Skills to Your New Company.  Your expertise and skills give you leverage to negotiate your employment…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/blog/2022/04/key-considerations-for-an-executive-reviewing-or-negotiating-an-executive-employment-contract/"><![CDATA[A well-defined employment contract allows both the Executive and the Company to enter a relationship with a clear and positive view toward the future relationship. Bertelson Law Office can help negotiate language to protect your interests.

Five key considerations for Executive Contracting:
<ol>
 	<li><strong>Remember You Bring Unique Skills to Your New Company. </strong></li>
</ol>
Your expertise and skills give you leverage to negotiate your employment relationship before it starts.  Smart companies will want to lock in your talent.
<ol start="2">
 	<li><strong> The Contract’s Description of your Duties, Title, and Reporting Structure Matters.</strong></li>
</ol>
Defining your job duties avoids potential misunderstandings later.  The job title you hold now could impact your future employment.  If you decided to accept the position because you understood you would be reporting to a particular person, is that person outlined in your contract.
<ol start="3">
 	<li><strong> Be Alert to Vague Compensation Language.</strong></li>
</ol>
Executive compensation is more than just salary and health benefits.  Executive compensation can include equity in the company, paid time off, car and smartphone allowances, payment of fees for professional organizations, among others.

Does the contract specify when stock options, RSU’s and other equity will be received?  Does the contract spell out the vesting schedule?  What are the terms for bonus payments? What happens to these benefits when your employment ends?
<ol start="4">
 	<li><strong> Take Restrictive Covenants Seriously.</strong></li>
</ol>
Restrictive covenants such as non-competes and non-solicitation agreements can negatively impact your future career, possibly restricting your post-employment job search.  Do not take such restrictions lightly.  Courts often uphold such restrictions.  Before signing an agreement, make sure the language will not put you on the “bench” after your employment with this company is over.
<ol start="5">
 	<li><strong>  Think About the End at the Beginning.   </strong></li>
</ol>
No one likes to think about the end of an employment relationship.  Unless there is language in the agreement to protect you, a company can end your employment at any time without compensation.  An experienced attorney can help protect your interests and help negotiate crucial language and future severance payments upfront – before you start your employment.

<strong>Bertelson Law Offices, P.A. has over 32 years of experience reviewing and strategically negotiating Executive agreements.</strong>

Because we practice exclusively in employment law, we can provide you with knowledgeable advocacy.  We get to know you well and provide personal service for your individual needs and goals. As experienced employment law attorneys Bertelson Law Offices will negotiate your Executive Employment Contracts by identifying areas of concerns, protecting your interests and your career in the long-term.

At Bertelson Law Offices, P.A. you will receive personal and assertive advocacy.

Please feel free to contact us at [nap_phone id="LOCAL-REGULAR-NUMBER-1"] or by email at <a href="mailto:beth@bertelsonlaw.com">beth@bertelsonlaw.com</a> and <a href="mailto:andrea@bertelsonlaw.com">andrea@bertelsonlaw.com</a>.

&nbsp;]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Bertelson Law Office, P.A.</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Can I Get Unemployment If I Voluntarily Accept A Severance Package Before I Am Terminated?]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/blog/2022/04/can-i-get-unemployment-if-i-voluntarily-accept-a-severance-package-before-i-am-terminated/" />
            <id>https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/?p=52227</id>
            <updated>2023-09-13T08:54:02Z</updated>
            <published>2022-04-05T14:23:32Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled that an employee who voluntarily accepted a severance package to avoid potentially being laid off did not have a good reason to quit her employment and could not receive unemployment benefits.  Ward v. Delta Airlines, A21-0932, (Minn. Ct. Apps. April 4, 2022). In March 2020, Delta Airlines placed employee Teresa Ward on a paid…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/blog/2022/04/can-i-get-unemployment-if-i-voluntarily-accept-a-severance-package-before-i-am-terminated/"><![CDATA[The Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled that an employee who voluntarily accepted a severance package to avoid potentially being laid off did not have a good reason to quit her employment and could not receive unemployment benefits.  <em>Ward v. Delta Airlines, </em>A21-0932, (Minn. Ct. Apps. April 4, 2022).

In March 2020, Delta Airlines placed employee Teresa Ward on a paid leave of absence due to the Covid-19 pandemic.  Ms. Ward had worked for Delta for 13 years in customer service. In June 2020, Delta offered its employees a voluntary severance package if they chose to leave the company.  According to Ms. Ward, Delta had told employees they could voluntarily leave the company and get a severance package to prevent being possibly being laid off and receiving no severance.  Delta told employees that if not enough people volunteered to leave and accept the severance package, there would be forced layoffs and those laid off employees would not receive a severance package.  Ms. Ward did not know if she would have been one of those employees laid off.  Not knowing if she would be out of a job with no money, Ms. Ward chose to voluntarily resign in order to receive the severance package.

Under Minnesota unemployment laws, an employee who quits their employment is generally not eligible for unemployment benefits.  One exception is if there is a “good reason” caused by the employer.  The Minnesota Court of Appeals determined that, Ms. Ward did not have a “good reason” for quitting her employment caused by Delta Airlines.  As a result, Ms. Ward was not eligible to receive unemployment benefits.

Minnesota’s unemployment law statute contains a provision stating,  “notification of discharge in the future, including a layoff because of lack of work, is not a good reason caused by the employer for quitting.”  Minn. Stat. §268.095, subd. 3(e) (2020).    Minnesota’s unemployment law statute also states, “An employee who has been notified that the employee will be discharged in the future, who chooses to end the employment while employment in any capacity is still available, has quit the employment.”  Minn. Stat. § 268.095 subd. 2(c) (2020).

The Court found Ms. Ward’s situation was similar to one in which an employee quits after notification of a future discharge.  In that case, the employee who quits before the employment end date set by the employer is not eligible for unemployment benefits.

If you find yourself in this situation, call us at [nap_phone id="LOCAL-REGULAR-NUMBER-1"] or email us at<span style="color: #0000ff;"> <a style="color: #0000ff;" href="mailto:beth@bertelsonlaw.com">beth@bertelsonlaw.com</a> </span>and<span style="color: #0000ff;"> andrea@bertelsonlaw.com</span>.  We over 30 years of experience advising employees on their options and proactively helping employees with work situations.

&nbsp;]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Bertelson Law Office, P.A.</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Why Executives Should Negotiate Their Exit Before They Start Their Employment]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/blog/2022/01/why-executives-should-negotiate-their-exit-before-they-start-their-employment/" />
            <id>https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/?p=52019</id>
            <updated>2023-09-13T08:54:06Z</updated>
            <published>2022-01-11T15:34:26Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[Employment Contract, Executive Contract]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[It may seem illogical for Executives to think about how their employment will end when they receive a job offer but negotiating upfront on separation benefits and terms helps to remove unknowns in your employment relationship.  Negotiating your exit upfront, can help to remove some of the risk and stress if a future layoff or unexpected termination occurs. Beth Bertelson…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/blog/2022/01/why-executives-should-negotiate-their-exit-before-they-start-their-employment/"><![CDATA[It may seem illogical for Executives to think about how their employment will end when they receive a job offer but negotiating upfront on separation benefits and terms helps to remove unknowns in your employment relationship.  Negotiating your exit upfront, can help to remove some of the risk and stress if a future layoff or unexpected termination occurs.

Beth Bertelson regularly counsels senior executives and leaders on employment contracts and severance packages.  She views good faith employment negotiations as akin to the role a prenuptial agreement plays in a relationship.

Bertelson explains, “Executives really need to think about leaving the company at the beginning, so they can move forward productively in their careers.”

“When people are signing on to work for a company, they may be signing on to restrictive covenants that can impact their career going forward.  Signing a non-competes or non-solicitations, without receiving adequate consideration on the back end could put an executive on the bench for years.”

She added, “Upfront negotiations can also clarify issues related to long-term incentives, bonuses, roles and responsibilities, and avenues for each party to exit the relationship.”

Negotiating separation package benefits at the start of the employment relationship fosters goodwill on both sides, lessens uncertainty for the Executive, and eliminates legal risk to the employer.

Having an objective legal resource helps you avoid blind spots that can hinder your career opportunities. Beth Bertelson has assisted numerous Executives negotiate employment contracts both at the beginning and ending of the employment relationship.

Contact Bertelson Law Offices, P.A. at [nap_phone id="LOCAL-REGULAR-NUMBER-1"] or <a href="mailto:beth@bertelsonlaw.com">beth@bertelsonlaw.com</a> for assistance with your employment contract.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Bertelson Law Office, P.A.</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Don’t Sign A Separation Agreement At The Termination Meeting]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/blog/2022/01/dont-sign-a-separation-agreement-at-the-termination-meeting-2/" />
            <id>https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/?p=52017</id>
            <updated>2023-09-13T08:54:10Z</updated>
            <published>2022-01-11T15:33:41Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[Layoffs, Losing your job, Severance, Severance agreement]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Being terminated or laid off is traumatic.  If you are offered a separation agreement don’t sign it at the meeting.  Take your time.  Read it carefully.  Consult with an attorney.  In many cases, you have at least 21 days to decide if you want to sign it.  (The Agreement will set forth the time period you have in which to…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.bertelsonlaw.com/blog/2022/01/dont-sign-a-separation-agreement-at-the-termination-meeting-2/"><![CDATA[Being terminated or laid off is traumatic.  If you are offered a separation agreement don’t sign it at the meeting.  Take your time.  Read it carefully.  Consult with an attorney.  In many cases, you have at least 21 days to decide if you want to sign it.  (The Agreement will set forth the time period you have in which to sign it.).

When you sign these agreements, you are giving up your right to pursue legal action against your employer in exchange for the money the employer is offering you.  The agreement often imposes obligations on you.

An attorney can help you figure out whether it makes sense to pursue additional benefits or give up your right to pursue legal action against your employer in exchange for the money offered in the agreement.

There are many things to consider, such as:
<ul>
 	<li>Do I have legal claims against my employer</li>
 	<li>If I sign, will I be subject to a non-compete or other types of restrictions?</li>
 	<li>If I sign, will I have any ongoing obligations to the employer?</li>
 	<li>Will my employer pay me for outstanding business expenses?</li>
 	<li>Will my employer pay me for my bonus?</li>
 	<li>Will I receive payment for unused Paid Time Off (PTO)?</li>
 	<li>If I sign the agreement, can I still get long-term disability benefits?</li>
 	<li>Can I get unemployment compensation benefits?</li>
 	<li>If I find a new job, will I have to give the money back to the employer?</li>
</ul>
Bertelson Law Offices, P.A. has over 50 years of combined experience reviewing, evaluating and strategically negotiating severance agreements, separation agreements, buy-out packages, executive agreements and non-compete agreements.

If you’re terminated or laid off and given a separation agreement, give us a call at [nap_phone id="LOCAL-REGULAR-NUMBER-1"] or email us at <a href="mailto:beth@bertelsonlaw.com">beth@bertelsonlaw.com</a>.

Because we practice exclusively in employment law, we provide you with knowledgeable and caring experience, as well as personal service for your individual needs and goals. We offer a thorough review to help you determine how your situation would be impacted by signing, or if it would be appropriate to move forward with legal claims or with negotiating changes to the agreement, such as increasing the amount your employer is offering and language changes to the agreement.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;]]></content>
						        </entry>
	</feed>